Teollimi

Data breach fines: Korea vs Japan, the US and Australia

Checked against official sources Nov 10, 2026

Short answer

Korea fines companies heavily for data breaches: ₩624.7 billion (about US$409M) for Coupang and ₩134.8 billion for SK Telecom. Breaches of the same size or larger elsewhere drew far less. In Japan, KDDI leaked 12.2 million people's email passwords, 7.6 million of them stored in plain text, and got guidance with no fine, because Japanese law has no fine for breaches. In the US, Change Healthcare's 192.7 million-person breach has no federal penalty yet. In Australia, the regulator closed its Qantas inquiry (5.12 million people) without taking action. The UK and France do fine: Capita £14M and Free €42M. As of 10 November 2026.

Same size, different outcome

People affected as each company or regulator reported them. Korean won are converted at ₩1,500 = US$1 for a rough comparison only. "None found" means we searched the regulator's own enforcement list on 10 November 2026.

Regulator outcomes after large data breaches (as of 2026-11-10)
Company (country)Regulator outcomePeople affectedDecided
Coupang (Korea)₩624.7 billion fine (≈ US$409M), the largest in Korea; covers the security failures and unlawful collection37.55 million (PIPC)June 2026
SK Telecom (Korea)₩134.8 billion fine (≈ US$90M)23.24 millionAugust 2025
KT (Korea)₩54.0 billion fine (≈ US$36M)16,647 (PIPC count)July 2026
Louis Vuitton Korea, Dior Korea, Tiffany Korea₩21.4bn, ₩12.2bn and ₩2.4bn (₩36bn in total, ≈ US$24M)About 3.6M, 1.95M and 4,600February 2026
KDDI (Japan)Guidance (指導) under APPI Article 147. No fine12,231,954; 7,616,173 passwords stored in plain text19 August 2026
NTT Business Solutions / NTT Marketing Act ProCX (Japan)Recommendation (勧告) and guidance. No fineAbout 9.28 million (insider, 2013–2023)24 January 2024
LY Corporation (LINE Yahoo) (Japan)Recommendation (勧告). No fineAbout 520,00028 March 2024
Nitori (Japan)Pending; Japan cannot fine for a breachUp to 37.62 million records (possible leak)Disclosed 9 November 2026
Change Healthcare (US)HHS OCR investigation opened March 2024; no resolution or penalty listed192.7 million—
AT&T (US, two 2024 breaches)No regulator fine for either. Victims: US$177M class settlementAbout 73 million, and call records of about 109 million accounts—
Qantas (Australia)OAIC closed preliminary inquiries without an investigation or other regulatory actionAbout 5.12 million AustraliansReport published 16 July 2026
Latitude Financial (Australia/NZ)OAIC investigation open since May 2023; no outcome yet14 million+ records—
Capita (UK)ICO fine £14M (cut from a proposed £45M)6.6 million15 October 2025
Free / Free Mobile (France)CNIL fines €42M in total24 million contractsJanuary 2026
Regulator outcomes after large data breaches (as of 2026-11-10) · scroll sideways to see every column

Same attack wave, fined only in Korea

In 2025 attackers tricked staff and support desks into giving access to the cloud customer databases of Louis Vuitton, Dior and Tiffany. Korea's PIPC fined their Korean units ₩36 billion in February 2026 and said a company stays responsible for security when it keeps customer data in a SaaS product.

  • Louis Vuitton in Türkiye: 142,995 people. The KVKK published the breach notice; we found no penalty decision.
  • Louis Vuitton UK, Dior and Tiffany in the UK: no entry in the ICO's enforcement list. Louis Vuitton and Dior in the US: no FTC case; class actions only. France: no matching CNIL sanction.
  • Tiffany in the US and Canada (about 2,500 people): Canada's privacy commissioner said it was reviewing the report. Tiffany Korea (4,600 people) was fined ₩2.4 billion.
  • Qantas fell to a social engineering attack on an overseas third-party provider in the same period. The OAIC found no likely failure to take reasonable steps and took no action. Press reports tie these attacks to the same group; regulators have not said so.

Why the gap

  • Korea: the PIPC can fine up to 3% of total revenue for failing to protect data, and up to 10% for repeat, intentional or grossly negligent cases from 11 September 2026. It fines the security failure itself, not only misuse.
  • Japan: the Personal Information Protection Commission can give guidance, a recommendation or an order, but cannot fine. The 2026 amendment adds a surcharge from July 2028 at the latest, only for illegally using, obtaining or passing on data for money. A leak caused by poor security (Article 23) is not covered.
  • United States: there is no national breach fine. The FTC said in its 2024 Marriott order (344 million customers) that it had no legal authority to obtain civil penalties in that case; Marriott paid US$52M to state attorneys general instead. Money comes from states, the SEC for misleading investors, or sector regulators such as HHS and the FCC.
  • Australia: penalties can reach A$50 million or 30% of turnover, and the first civil penalty came in October 2025 (A$5.8M, Australian Clinical Labs). Cases against Optus and Medibank, both from 2022, are still in court.
  • UK and EU: the ICO and the CNIL do fine for breaches, as Capita, Free and 23andMe (£2.31M for 155,592 UK users) show.

What this means if your data leaked

  • A fine goes to the government, not to you. Compensation comes from the company's own offer, a class action or a claim in court; see compensation by country.
  • US: check our open settlements for claim deadlines, and keep the breach letter.
  • Japan: there is no statutory compensation; companies usually offer an apology payment or vouchers. Watch the company's notice.
  • Anywhere: change reused passwords first, and never pay a fee to someone offering to claim for you.

Facts gathered from regulator pages and news reports up to 10 November 2026. Several cases (Nitori, Change Healthcare, Latitude) are still open and may end in a penalty later. General information, not legal advice.

Share this guide

Official sources

General information, not legal advice. Teollimi does not file claims or refer people to claims firms.